Golden Heard's legal counselor says entertainer would 'by no means' have the option to pay Johnny Depp $10.35 million in harms
Golden Heard's legal counselor says entertainer would 'by no means' have the option to pay Johnny Depp $10.35 million in harms
Golden Heard's legal counselor uncovered that she couldn't pay Johnny Depp $10.35 million in harms. The US jury gave its decision for Johnny in the criticism preliminary.
Jury gave its decision in Johnny Depp's approval in his criticism case with Amber Heard.
Golden Heard's legal counselor Elaine Charlsonn Bredhoft said the entertainer couldn't pay her ex, entertainer Johnny Depp, $10.35 million in harms.
In another meeting on Thursday, Amber's legal counselor said that Amber was 'disparaged' in the US court.
Elaine likewise expressed that few things 'were permitted in this court that shouldn't have been permitted'.
The US jury gave its decision for Johnny Depp in the criticism preliminary.
The extensive, high-profile broadcast court fight finished when a seven-man jury found that Johnny and Amber had stigmatized one another, however sided undeniably more emphatically with Johnny.
The jury granted him $10.35 million in harms, conversely, with the $2 million granted to Amber.
Talking with Today, Amber's legal counselor said about the decision, "She was disparaged here. Various things were permitted in this court that shouldn't have been permitted, and it made the jury be confounded.
We weren't permitted to enlighten them concerning the UK judgement...There are no harms. It halted at November 2, 2020, which is the point at which the judgment descended in the UK." When inquired as to whether Amber can pay Johnny the judgment, Elaine answered, "God help us, by no means".
Alluding to the 2020 case in the UK, she said, "The court tracked down there, and we weren't permitted to let the jury know this, yet the court found that Mr Depp had committed no less than 12 demonstrations of abusive behavior at home, including sexual brutality against Amber.
So what did Depp's group gain from this? Vilify Amber, and stifle the proof. We had a tremendous measure of proof that was stifled for this situation that was in the UK case. In the UK situation when it came in, Amber won, Mr Depp, lost."
Johnny sued Amber over a commentary she composed for The Washington Post in December 2018 in which she depicted herself as a "person of note addressing homegrown maltreatment." She didn't name Johnny in the piece, yet he sued her for suggesting he was a homegrown victimizer and looked for $50 million in harms.
Golden countersued for $100 million, saying she was maligned by explanations made by Johnny's legal counselor, Adam Waldman.

Comments
Post a Comment